The Constraints-led Approach Framework in Training and Coaching.
Abstract
Movement “constraint” is defined as a variable that defines the way a movement can be organized and controlled. The “constraint model” emphasises the important interactions of individual constraints, environmental constraints, and those of skill - in a balanced perspective - and suggests that constraints can shape the manifestation of movement patterns, cognitive processes, and decision-making processes. According to the Constraints Model, any learning / teaching environment should be arranged in such a manner as to provide any learner with capability or protentional into movement. Therefore, in this way, each youngster will feel that they have accomplishing something, improving their perception of their abilities and, thus, their self-confidence. The application of the Constraint Model within PE can help to ‘shape’ young people who will progress in life with fluency and skill, will be creative and confident, and have acquired a deep understanding and knowledge of how they interact within a dynamic and ever constantly changing environment.
Downloads
References
Barris, S., Farrow, D., & Davids, K. (2014). Increasing functional variability in the preparatory phase of the takeoff improves elite springboard diving performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 97-106.
Brymer, E., & Renshaw, I. (2010). An introduction to the constraints-led approach to learning in outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 14(2), 33-41.
Chow, J., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araujo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251-278.
Gagen, L., & Getchell, N. (2006). Using ‘constraints’ to design developmentally appropriate movement activities for early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, doi: 10.1007/510643-006-0135-6
Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2016). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 517-538.
Panteli, F., Smirniotou, A., & Theodorou, A. (2016). Performance environment and nested task constraints influence long jump approach run: a preliminary study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(12), 1116-1123.
Renshaw, I., Araujo, D., Button, C., Chow, J., Davids, K., & Moy, B, (2015). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: a clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459-480.
Renshaw, I., Chow, J., Davids, K., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,15(2), 117-137.
Roberts, W., Newcombe, D., & Davids, K. (2018). Application of a constraints-led approach to pedagogy in schools: embarking on a journey to nurture physical literacy in primary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 162-175.
Rudd, J., O’Callaghan, L., & Williams, J. (2019). Physical education pedagogies built upon theories of movement learning: how can environmental constraints be manipulated to improve children’s executive function skills and self-regulation skills? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 1630, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091630
Seifert, L., Wattebled, L., L’Hermette, B., Bideault, G., Herault, R., & Davids, K. (2013). Skill transfer, affordances, and dexterity in different climbing environments. Human Movement Science, 32, 1339-1352.
Thomas, G. (2007). Skill instruction in outdoor leadership: a comparison of a direct instruction model and a discovery-learning model. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 11(2), 10-18.
