Greek fragility hip fracture registry 2025 annual report

Authors

  • Efthymios Iliopoulos
  • Theodoros Tosounidis
  • Antigoni Gkodina
  • Athanasia Charmpi
  • Fotios Tilkidis
  • Alkison Kotsis
  • Dimitra Melissaridou
  • Maria Sentona
  • Georgios Graikos
  • Sotirios Themistokleous
  • Ioannis Spyrou
  • Olga Theodorolea
  • Elpida Arealis
  • Maria Papathanasiou
  • Vasiliki Trianatafyllopoulou
  • Eleni Giannakou
  • Irini Tatani
  • Ioannis Gkiatas
  • Byron Chalidis
  • Angelos Kaspiris
  • Ioannis Papachristos
  • Nikolaos Patsiogiannis
  • Alexandros Apostolopoulos
  • Ioanna Lianou
  • Christianna Zidrou
  • Olga Savvidou
  • Georgios Drosos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69133/aoth.v77i2.533

Keywords:

Hip fracture; fragility fractures; osteoporosis; clinical registry; Greece; geriatric trauma; quality of care; national registry

Abstract

The Greek Fragility Hip Fracture Registry continued its expansion in 2025, its third year of operation, with five additional orthopaedic departments joining the initiative and increasing the number of active centres to thirteen. During the year, data from 2046 patients were recorded, raising the total number of cases in the registry to 4228. The mean patient age was approximately 83 years and the majority were female (71.2%). Most patients lived independently prior to injury and had preserved cognitive function. Intertrochanteric fractures were the most common fracture type (50.7%), followed by displaced intracapsular fractures (34.4%). Operative treatment was performed in most cases, predominantly using intramedullary nailing or hip hemiarthroplasty, although only 35.2% of patients underwent surgery within the recommended 48-hour from admission timeframe. The mean length of hospital stay in 2025 was 9.1 days, slightly reduced compared with the previous year, and in-hospital mortality was 3.2%. Most patients were mobilized on the first postoperative day and were discharged home, while approximately one quarter were transferred to rehabilitation facilities. However, documentation of secondary fracture prevention remained limited, with only 21.2% of patients discharged with recorded anti-osteoporotic treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 11.2%, showing improvement compared with 2024. Overall, the registry continues to provide important national data on fragility hip fracture care and highlights areas requiring further improvement, particularly timely surgery and secondary fracture prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Efthymios Iliopoulos

Metabolic Disease and Fragility Fractures Unit, Academic Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

Theodoros Tosounidis

Academic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece

Antigoni Gkodina

Metabolic Disease and Fragility Fractures Unit, Academic Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

Athanasia Charmpi

Academic Orthopaedic Department, Patras General University Hospital, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

Fotios Tilkidis

Academic Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Ioannina, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Alkison Kotsis

Academic Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece

Dimitra Melissaridou

First Academic Orthopaedic Department, ‘Attikon’ General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Maria Sentona

Second Orthopaedic Department, ‘Papageorgiou’ General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Georgios Graikos

First Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papanikolaou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece

Sotirios Themistokleous

Orthopaedic Department of Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece

Ioannis Spyrou

Third Department of Orthopaedics, ‘KAT’ General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Olga Theodorolea

First Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Athens «G. Gennimatas», Athens, Greece

Elpida Arealis

Orthopaedic Department of General Prefectural Athens Korgialenio Benakeio Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece

Maria Papathanasiou

Orthopaedic Department of General Hospital of Patras ‘Agios Andreas’

Vasiliki Trianatafyllopoulou

Orthopaedic Department of General Hospital of Tripolis

Eleni Giannakou

Orthopaedic Department of General Hospital of Tripolis

Irini Tatani

Academic Orthopaedic Department, Patras General University Hospital, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

Ioannis Gkiatas

Academic Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Ioannina, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Byron Chalidis

First Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papanikolaou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece

Angelos Kaspiris

Third Department of Orthopaedics, ‘KAT’ General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Ioannis Papachristos

Orthopaedic Department of Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece

Nikolaos Patsiogiannis

First Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Athens «G. Gennimatas», Athens, Greece

Alexandros Apostolopoulos

Orthopaedic Department of General Prefectural Athens Korgialenio Benakeio Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece

Ioanna Lianou

Orthopaedic Department of General Hospital of Patras ‘Agios Andreas’

Christianna Zidrou

Second Orthopaedic Department, ‘Papageorgiou’ General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Olga Savvidou

First Academic Orthopaedic Department, ‘Attikon’ General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Georgios Drosos

Metabolic Disease and Fragility Fractures Unit, Academic Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

References

1. Yeritsyan D, Momenzadeh K, Mohamadi A, Mortensen SJ, Beeram IR, Caro D, et al. Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated with Fragility Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vol. 4, Osteology. 2024. p. 64–87.

2. Jozefowski N, Eikani C, Lingampalli N, Lawler P, Barrett A, Hoyt A, et al. The Impact of National Orthopaedic Fracture Registries: A Systematic Review. OTA Int [Internet]. 2025;8(1).

3. Babagoli M, Ghaseminejad Raeini A, Sheykhvatan M, Baghdadi S, Shafiei SH. Influencing factors on morbidity and mortality in intertrochanteric fractures. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2023;13(1):12090.

4. Griffin XL, Achten J, Parsons N, Costa ML, collaborators Wh. Does performance-based remuneration improve outcomes in the treatment of hip fracture? RESULTS FROM THE WHITE MULTICENTRE HIP FRACTURE COHORT. Bone Joint J. 2021;103(5):881–7.

5. Iliopoulos E, Tosounidis T, Moustafa RM, Tilkidis F, Daskalakis I, Melissaridou D, et al. The use of minimum common data set in the development of the Greek Fragility Hip Fracture Registry in the Greek health care setting: the first year of its pilot implementation. Arch Osteoporos [Internet]. 2024;19(1):85.

6. Griffin XL, Achten J, Parsons N, Costa ML. Does performance- ­ based remuneration improve outcomes in the treatment of hip fracture ? 2017;881–7.

7. Patel NK, Sarraf KM, Joseph S, Lee C, Middleton FR. Implementing the National Hip Fracture Database: an audit of care. Injury. 2013;44(12):1934–9.

8. Hallen J, Close J, Harvey L, Jin X, Fleming S, Wall C. Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) Annual Report 2025.

9. Ellanti P, Cushen B, Galbraith A, Brent L, Hurson C, Ahern E. Improving hip fracture care in Ireland: a preliminary report of the Irish hip fracture database. J Osteoporos. 2014;2014(1):656357.

10. Werner M, Macke C, Gogol M, Krettek C, Liodakis E. Differences in hip fracture care in Europe: a systematic review of recent annual reports of hip fracture registries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg [Internet]. 2022;48(3):1625–38.

11. Ojeda-Thies C, Sáez-López P, Currie CT, Tarazona-Santalbina FJ, Alarcón T, Muñoz-Pascual A, et al. Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:1243–54.

12. Huette P, Abou-Arab O, Djebara AE, Terrasi B, Beyls C, Guinot PG, et al. Risk factors and mortality of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a one-year follow-up study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9607.

13. Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H, Lefor AK, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Timing of surgery for hip fractures in the elderly : A retrospective cohort. Injury [Internet]. 2018;49(10):1848–54.

14. Li X, Gong X, He L, Wu X. Current surgical status of hip fracture among elderly in China. Injury [Internet]. 2024;55(2):111083.

15. Morrissey N, Iliopoulos E, Osmani AW, Newman K. Neck of femur fractures in the elderly: Does every hour to surgery count? Injury. 2017;48(6).

16. Iliopoulos E, Tosounidis T, Moustafa RM, Charmpi A, Tilkidis F, Daskalakis I, et al. Greek fragility hip fracture registry 2024 annual report. Acta Orthop Traumatol Hell. 2025;76(1).

17. Makras P, Babis GC, Chronopoulos E, Karachalios T, Kazakos K, Paridis D, et al. Experience gained from the implementation of the fracture liaison service in Greece. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15:1–8.

18. Makras P, Panagoulia M, Mari A, Rizou S, Lyritis GP. Evaluation of the first fracture liaison service in the Greek healthcare setting. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:1–6.

19. Altsitzioglou Pavlos; Mavrogenis Andreas; Makras Polyzois. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): a Review. acta Orthop Traumatol Hell. 2025;74(2):6–15.

20. Iliopoulos E, Drosos G. Can a fracture liaison service (FLS) be successfully established in Greece? acta Orthop Traumatol Hell. 2025;76(1):1–2.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06